Quote:
Originally Posted by
Judders
➡️
Whose game will be upped?
Mix and mastering engineers don't have the same taste now that they did 20, 40, or 60 years ago. Just like screenwriters and directors don't either. There is a feedback loop between creatives and audiences that pushes and pulls the zeitgeist according to social conditions.
Where will the zeitgeist be when all entertainment is amalgamated by LLMs from past human work? How does it communicate something about our present selves when it's a gumbo of old ideas? There is precious little room for innovation as it is, how will ever-reducing budgets give anyone a chance to take artistic risks?
Why are you so concerned with how people do their makeup?
Makes no sense in my mind at all considering how well even the current artificial intelligence systems are going to be able to absorb whatever input is given outperforming human output in real life; that is your argumentation I'm referring to.
So whatever the preference of the garbage consumers enjoy will be irrelevant that's why you as an individual can concern yourself with whatever you feel like concerning yourself with without consulting with the hierarchy stack at all.
My point is that individuals will be able to collect their information based on choice on how they want to utilize artificial intelligence sort of how the traditional media gatekeepers have lost traction of whatever the gate keeps like the binary going through a semiconductor circuit the little zeros and ones have to conform to the quantum reality that's why the information never travels in a linear fashion in a semiconductor circuit and finds it's own path sort of like artificial intelligence will; when it transform itself like a little worm becoming a butterfly from general artificial intelligence to super artificial intelligence.
Anybody thinking that that's not achievable better pick up the easley downloaded PDF files ((academic papers) in the field of artificial intelligence there a lot of them ; but like anything in life it's important to know what to negate sort of like somebody else's preference or any other preference as a matter of fact impeding on an individual's choice even if it goes beyond the limitation of the wishes of the psychosis within any hierarchy stack constellation of talking human Monkeys.
Artificial intelligence systems will definitely be able to become more powerful than humans now that it would be idiotic to assume that large language model in their current form is the end station for artificial intelligence development.
And that leads me to choice if a 7 year old can out perform the consumer driven consumption garbage delivered by the "gatekeepers" by factor of a lot and entertain me with a prompt with whatever they express inside of their undeveloped brains why not?
As a matter of fact an artificial intelligence system will be able to take all those inputs you referred to in your non-cohesive and empirically inaccurate and absurd argumentation and create novel innovative art of all sorts in a revolutionary manner that would astonish a human; of course the egos within the "artistic" community will not be able to recognize it which will inevitably force a lot of "professionals" and amateurs to "up" their game.
It's sort of like performing in a shooting game: humans will not be able to compete with an algorithm but the human monkeys seem to like the collective experience and each other even if they're inferior with respect to skill set output delivery and seem to be very clear on what they seem to appreciate or not ; which usually is some sort of mass human hierarchy based psychosis as far as I can observe with my limited senses which will be inferior by factor of a lot compared to future artificial intelligence systems being developed as of now.
Sort of like how Mu zero was able to astonish the go player but on steroids.
So in my mind your argumentation is irrelevant and I might as well be talking to a goldfish in a wine glass now that some successful artist seem to have a love affair with their plastic surgeons in the order to please their fan base mediocracy.
The output of these systems will be superior to anything any human can achieve by factor of a lot; and as an individual that prioritizes output efficiency over human centric input knowing that apple is not an ecosystem because it's not a biological naturally induced system but a human centric one; I think that's a great thing.




