Quote:
Originally Posted by
zerocrossing
β‘οΈ
They actually did an optimization pass since the release and itβs not as bad. I ended up getting it because I think it has an interesting character. Somewhat like analog, but not like any analog Iβve ever heard. Definitely not like a standard Moog 24 db ladder filter.
Just for shits and giggles I downloaded Mariana and activated the 10-day trial. It's an interesting plugin with a somewhat unique sound. It doesn't sound convincingly analog. But it does have a slight "Moogy" vibe to it that's hard to describe.
The modulation system is interesting. It took me just a second to figure out what's going on. I kept wanting to adjust the mod amounts on the destination knobs themselves. But you have to do it in the sidebar on the left.
I don't know if I prefer that to a standard mod matrix or not. But it's cool to see something different for a change.
But man, the CPU consumption is still out of control on my M1 Max MacBook Pro using Studio One Pro v6.6 and the VST3 version of Mariana. I had a bunch of other plugins instantiated so they were using some CPU power just idling. But still, Mariana uses about 4 times the amount of CPU power judging from Studio One's performance meter than something like Steinberg's Retrologue plugin.
While Mariana sounds different from Retrologue, I wouldn't say Mariana necessarily sounds better. And I prefer Retrologue's more straightforward and conventional interface. Plus Retrologue provides more voices of polyphony and its oscillators are way more versatile and it includes a much broader range of effects.
And this isn't even comparing Mariana to higher end analog modeling plugins like Diva, Repro-5, The Legend, and the various Arturia V-Collection synths. I think Mariana comes up short in those comparisons.
So even at $49, I think I'll pass on Mariana. If the CPU consumption was about a quarter of what it currently is, then I might consider it. But it's not worth the CPU hit for what it offers in terms of sound and features, IMO.