Arturia V Collection 11 by cr73645
The synth world would not be the same without the iconic Arturia V Collection. This is an anthology of software synthesizers, and for this, difficult to deeply evaluate its components, since each included synth is a whole universe on its own. I’m honored to be able to finally review the tenth iteration of it: Arturia V Collection X.
Since its first version, the V Collection has grown into an even deeper and greater homage to the synths from the past, with additional instruments to complete the whole experience. In total, there are 39 different instruments inside V Collection, each with its own emulation of different kinds of keyboard/synth instruments.
What is it?
Like said before, a compilation of different Arturia software instruments in a single license. There are so many choices that one could spend a whole year having some fun with the different instruments and deeper exploration of each of them could take a lot more time.
I’ll list the included instruments on each category:
Analog Lab Pro allows the integration of all different products inside Arturia V Collection in a single interface, adding stuff like layers and splits for example.
Analog synthesizers: Mini V (new version), Acid V (new), KORG MS-20 V, CS-80 V, Prophet-5 V, Vocoder V, OP-XA V, Jun-6 V, Buchla Easel V, Jup-8 V, ARP2600 V, Modular V, Synthi V, Matrix-12 V.
Digital synthesizers: MiniFreak V (new), Emulator II V, SQ80 V, Prophet-VS V, Synclavier V, CZ V, DX7 V, CMI V.
Keyboards and organs: Farfisa V, Solina V, Vox Continental V, Mellotron V, B-3 V.
Acoustic and electric pianos: CP-70 V (new), Wurli V (new version), Piano V, Clavinet V, Stage-73 V.
Augmented instruments: Woodwinds, Grand Piano (new), Brass(new), Strings, Voices.
Technical aspects
Installation is simple and done thru Arturia Software Center, which can also be used for updates and purchases of other Arturia products.
I’m using Windows 11 with an i7 processor, fast SSD, 32 GB of RAM, which is powerful enough to deal with pretty much any software synth I’ve ever thrown at it. With all the tested products (the only I couldn’t try is the Vocoder because of the lack of a decent enough microphone) there were no hiccups sound-wise, but some of them were certainly hungrier than others.
The Augmented Series overall can get quite CPU intense with high voice count. Some synths like the MS-20 in polyphonic mode can also get processing meter to higher values. With a less capable computer, you might get some sonic artifacts. On the positive side, most of these instruments do not require a lot of SSD space, which is great and possible because of the emulated nature instead of sampled of most of the instruments.
Tried multiple different controllers for testing all these products, ranging from small controllers such as Minilab 3 and Komplete Kontrol M32, some synthesizers like the Moog Grandmother and Korg Minilogue XD, and finally my digital piano (Yamaha Clavinova CLP-745). Each controller was used as desired for the best approach on each software – as an example, always chose the CLP-745 when precise control of velocity was needed – DX7 for example.
Interface
It’s good to have something that is made to be used as a collection. Overall, the interface shares a lot of similarity between all these instruments. One good thing is that all do have a standalone version that is resizable and with a good high resolution.
The Augmented Series and Analog Lab Pro do share a more user friendly main page with several macros directly accessible on the fly, everything coupled with a clean and beautiful interface.
On the synthesizers, you get almost a 1:1 copy of their original counterparts, which is very nice if you do have some familiarity with the hardware. On many you won’t even need to read anything if you’re used to it – Mini V is instantly usable for example. This is as expected for these emulations. KORG MS-20 V is a little different, just like the Modular V, because of the connections of the virtual cables inside the interface, but everything is easy to use, and I didn’t have any problem with it. The advanced features do vary a bit from one synth to another, but they share a similar interface and extra features, so editing is easy if you’ve learned it once.
Most of the pianos and keyboard instruments do have a different philosophy – clean interface, with the editing parameters hidden behind a click on the advanced tab. I’m not sure I like it, since it makes things a bit slower than necessary. I would have no problem editing the basic parameters directly from the main page (which is basically a “digital picture of a piano”).
One thing I kind of dislike is that if you use any of them on fullscreen, once you access the configuration tab you’ll need to refit everything because it just expands the current “window”. I’d rather have a kind of “pop-up window” instead.
What’s new with X?
For this first part of this review, I’ll keep things limited to what is new inside V Collection X (VCX) and later approach it in total. There are two new synths (Acid V and MiniFreak V), one new keyboard instrument (CP-70 V), two new Augmented Instruments (Brass and Grand Piano), two updates on previous instruments (Mini V4 and Wurly V3), three new sound packages exclusively for the VCX.

Acid V is an emulation of the iconic Roland TB-303 with several add-ons inside. There’s an in depth review here on GearSpace, but I’ll resume my opinions on it here, even though I’ve never had any contact with the original one besides recognizing its incredible sound. The oscillators and filters seems spot on to me, especially once it is processed thru the internal effects. Real time editing does suffer a bit from a quantized limitation on the MIDI side of things, but envelope action and all the extra modulations do compensate for that. Some of the overdrive possibilities inside it are great and will make it scream just as intended. For me, this is an incredible addition to the collection.

Acid V also provides some improvements on user interface for the sequencer.

Full view (without a "keyboard") is much more useful and gives quick control over modulations.
MiniFreak V is a digital/hybrid synthesizer with a different approach when compared to all the classics inside VCX. My first time experimenting with it provided several incredible surprises. The oscillator algorithms are just amazing and coupled with the modulation possibilities it goes way beyond conventional sounds that are already covered by the rest of the collection. This is a true gem and breath of fresh air in a collection that was kind of limited to historical beasts – it does have its own sound, and this is great. The emulated filter does sound pretty close to the original, although a bit more clinical/precise (this would probably be indistinguishable on most cases). One of my favorites within whole collection!
One thing that must be said about the MiniFreak V is that I had some MIDI problems when trying to use a generic MIDI controller – MIDI learn didn’t work as expected. With the Minilab 3 it was a smooth experience though.

Although not necessarily a new instrument, the rebuilt on Mini V is just exceptional. I had contact with the previous version, and it is a huge step forwards in terms of fidelity to the original Minimoog. They’ve updated it enough to make it on the same level as The Legend and Model 1972. The oscillator and filter models are just spot on. I’ve been using Moog synthesizers for quite some time now, and the feeling for the sound is that I’m hearing the hardware. Once again, because of MIDI limitations, the experience is not just as the same as with analog hardware, but not the focus of this review. The included extras (such as LFOs, arpeggiator, effects) and presets are also a welcome addition.

On the Augmented Instruments, I’ve been lucky enough to get a copy myself and write a full review for two of them (Grand Piano and Brass) for GearSpace. I do love the series, the interface, the usability, great presets, the inspirational use of acoustic instruments (I’m a classically trained advanced pianist for the last 25 years). Maybe not on the spirit of the original collection, I think it might not be as appreciated as it should, but I do suggest that users try for themselves with an open mind about it.

CP-70 V is also another new content for VCX. It does sound very good, but I’m not familiar with the sound of the original beast in person. My thinking towards this is that it does provide a certain fidelity when it comes to noises expected from and electro-acoustic instrument not always heard on sample-based large scale consumer products, and I did enjoy replaying Journey’s lines with it. The update on the Wurly made it a bit more truthful to the hardware, but maybe not as “round” as its real counterpart. It sounds good, not exceptional.
Analog Lab Pro?
This is the fabric that entangles all the 38 other instruments included on V Collection X. The idea is to expand what these instruments could do by combining them in different ways, while accessing a preset library including everything.

Main view for Analog Lab Pro - very clean and direct interface.
One great use of it is allowing layering and splits for different sound engines. Unfortunately limited to two parts, it’s a step towards something like a workstation synth. I’d love to create huge combinations for live use, maybe it will be the natural course of things. Even so, you can combine two different parts and selected effects for both, either splitting or layering sounds.

Some of the extra sound packages are also superb and although I do consider myself a decent sound designer, I wouldn’t be able to create some of the sounds found inside these packs. The 450 extra sounds included exclusively on VCX do have some amazing gems of sound design material.

Browser interface is shared between all plugins, very easy to use and search for different sounds.
Synth cave!
Well, to start the approach on the whole package, I just have to start from where it all began. Being a tribute to several great synthesizers from the past was probably the original concept for the V Collection. No, I won’t explore each individual instrument emulated here but I’ll share a few thoughts on everything that is included and certain highlights on the best bits (other than the mentions above for the “What’s new with X?” part of this review).
Summing up, this is like visiting an awesome synth museum and being able to use stuff you’d never even touch for yourself. Sometimes you’ll lose a bit on fidelity, other times you won’t even be able to compare (think of the CS-80), sometimes you’ll get just what you expect sound-wise. Once again, I’m not stating that using VCX provides the same feeling of using these in person, but you get an amazing collection without the troubles of actually dealing with older instruments – everything is also always calibrated, tuned and properly working, immediately available within a composition in your DAW, etcetera.

One of the first ones I’ve tried was Jun-6 V, and boy, it is amazing. Although available on previous versions of V Collection, I could not let it pass on how good it was on use. The sound is pretty much up there with the 106 emulation by Softube, and I was kind of surprised with it and happy to enjoy a modeled Juno-6. The interface is quite simple, and so was setting up my MIDI controls for pretty much everything. Easy to make sounds for the kind of genre I’m usually working with (mostly synthwave and its ramifications) on the fly. The other gem was Jup-8 V, which I also enjoyed almost as much. Both have the expected velvety Roland sound from the past with a great coding that is almost alias free on usable audio range.

KORG MS-20 V is something to be mentioned here. It feels alive, and although I didn’t use more than a few minutes of the modern remake of the hardware, I’d say from memory that it is pretty much the same (minus the experience, yes). Other than the patching abilities, the possibility of using it polyphonically allows provided me some great smiles while trying it – it is a bit CPU hungry when in poly mode. I really enjoyed the emulation and it does pack that analog mono bite, which is something I’ve tried side by side with the Moog Grandmother for some monophonic duo. The already mentioned update on the Mini V is also noteworthy, and one of the best from the pack.

Full control for each operator with a good interface.
DX-7 V is also incredible. Although I’m not at all a deep sound designer for these kind of sounds, the interface does make it a bit easier, maybe not as quickly as some other DX-7 emulations, but it does it with a clear and visual interface for those who know what they’re doing in a not so cramped interface (which is a problem with many other DX7 based plugins). The presets included here, with all the effects and stuff, do make me appreciate the FM sounds even more – there are some great ones!
Note that the synthesizers I didn’t spend a paragraph on a superficial evaluation here are just as amazing as the ones I did – I probably enjoyed some more than others because of familiarity and preference. All the synthesizers I’ve tried, digital or analog, gave me a very nice sensation of experimenting a different instrument, and the first trip, especially, was always followed by huge smiles and laughter. The development done by Arturia with these is really incredible when compared to stuff released over a decade ago.
The added functionality on all these emulations is also excellent when creating sounds. I do use analog hardware synths, and it’s very hard to not be able to save your own sounds with effects – I’ve used a Minimoog Voyager for some time, still have some good analog synths, had a few other gems here and there, but it’s night and day to be able to process your sounds saved with effects (something I love about the Minilogue XD) and I’d love to have a good FX collection inside these hardware machines.
With VCX you can save the sounds including the effects you’d expect to use them with, tempo synced to your project, etcetera. It also must be mentioned that the effects are good – some better than others, some inferior to dedicated effects software.
The extra modulations are also appreciated on several sythesizers on this pack, many of them originally (HW) limited when it comes to modulation sources and destinations. Additional LFOs, envelopes, some with a standard (and better) clean interface, make a huge difference in sound possibilities on simpler instruments (imagine the Minimoog or Juno emulations for example).
A limitation that can be heard on several of them is the scaling/stepping on filter movement with both MIDI and mouse tweaking. Of course, on a deep analysis, you can hear it with other parameters, but the filter is where you can hear it the most. It obviously doesn’t happen when modulating the filter with an envelope or LFO, only on real time tweaks. Other limitation on several models is that modulating things with “audio rate” might give you results that are not exactly what happens on analog instruments. This is something I’ve found on most modeled synthesizers I’ve ever tried/used.
Overall, if I had to purchase the collection for the synthesizers alone, I’d be happy. They’re very decent, pretty much all of them. I know that some are not quite as close to their “muses”, but in music production I’d say they provide the necessary basic tone and variety expected. Each instance and instrument used does carry its own sonic print and is what I believe synthesists are looking for. Other than that, it is just a big pack, and exploring all the possibilities would take a lot of time.
Keyboards and pianos??
I struggled at first to understand why these were available in a synth oriented collection. I later understood. V Collection evolved and started focusing on keyboard rig musicians/producers instead of only synth sounds. This is good and a gain for anyone using it.

V Collection X brought new improvements for the Wurly V electric piano sound.
Starting with the pianos, which I could take a lot more time exploring and sharing my thoughts, I’d say the while the electric ones are quite good, the acoustic piano (Piano V) isn’t the best possible (but it does what it proposes to do). The highlights go for the Stage-73 V and B-3 V in my most honest opinion.
Stage-73 V is a Rhodes emulation made with modelling and it does sound very good to me. As a single product, I wouldn’t put it with something the original Rhodes V8 Pro, but this one costs half the price of the V Collection on its entirety. The Rhodes included in VCX is very nice, with several different models and speakers, necessary conveniences for editing your sounds and a nice (and realistic) response to velocity.

The modeling includes several different instruments and speakers, and also provides extra effects.
The B-3 V is also very good. There are variations enough, editing is easy, some great drive algorithms and speaker emulations. Deep editing allows you to tailor your sound entirely and the results sound better than performance-oriented keyboards such as Nord or Yamaha (although I believe some will say I’m crazy).

Simple user interface for the main view. Advanced features on a dedicated tab.
Piano V is something I’ve approached with curiosity, but it still not as good as a sampled library in terms of realism. The emulation is good, the response to velocity feels nice and once calibrated just works, but there’s a certain sense of lack of a real piano sound, more noticeable on mid-lows. This is something I’ve tried closely listening details and playing solo classical piano music. I’m sure that in a pop/rock piece with some piano lines, it does a great job, but you can’t perform realistically any classical piano repertoire – trying to play Beethoven’s Pathetique Sonata with it just sounded very fake with the trills on the basses (this piece is something I tend to use as a test drive for any piano VST I try).
Augmented Instruments
As stated before, I love the series. These instruments are inspirational and provide some sonic variation from the standard basic waveforms usually found on synthesizers. My first contact with them was through Augmented Grand Piano and at first I wasn’t entirely sure on the philosophy behind the product. After you face it like a Grand Piano inspired synthesizer, it will be easier to digest certain limitations such as voice count.

Clean interface with easy to use macros on all Augmented Instruments.
I encourage anyone to try these different Augmented Instruments, as they all do have many interesting presets to work with and discover how one can diverge from the original source and create something entirely new. The interface on all of them is very good for preset playing, there’s a vast modulation matrix for many parameters, the sound engine is a combination of different synthesis methods and samples, they’re just individually really deep to address everything in this review. Do remember that some of these can heavily hit the processing capabilities of your computer.

Advanced editing of parameters on Augmented Instruments share the same interface - you can check some of its synth-power with this image.
My previous reviews on the Augmented Grand Piano and Augmented Brass might be a good reading material to complement what is written here.
Missing parts
Well… in such a big collection, it’s kind of absurd to say something is missing, even considering the price-tag for the product. Here I share one thought: where are the analog and digital drum machines?
I’ve always thought that drum sounds are just as important as synth sounds when it comes to synthesizer focused music. With all the extra keyboards and Augmented Instruments, I did ask myself: why not a single modeled drum machine? You can create these sounds from all the available different synthesizers, but a focused interface and quickly recognizable model for different drum machines is something way more useful, at least to me.
Yes, yes, samples can cover that, but I’d love to see some new content going in this direction. This claim does not take a single hit on the quality of the entire collection, but a product focusing on different synths and drum machines would be amazing.
Target population
I believe that any synth enthusiast searching for good emulations should consider Arturia V Collection – short list it. The available models and great amount of content inside it makes it a great product overall. There’s space for development on some aspects of functionality and sound, but Arturia seems reliable on the long run with all its software products.
I would say that this is not the best if synthesizers are not your focus. Although present here, I would not invest on it if I just wanted the electric pianos or organ, since there are other alternatives for that, focused on big sonic libraries and stuff.
As a performance musician on synth sounds in need for some conventional keyboard sounds, this one might just be the one for you. I can see myself using everything in a live situation, as it worked in a very stable manner in the last 3 months I’ve been experimenting with everything inside V Collection X.
“Money, it’s a crime”
Yes, 600 bucks is not that little. What should be considered is the actual need of this much content in a package – a single hardware synthesizer from the collection could go for more than that, even the ones that are more affordable. When comparing with other libraries, it seems to follow the trend, at least price-wise.
For U$600, I’d consider going for a bit further and getting the full Arturia experience with the Sound Explorers Collection 2 (in reality, wait for the 3rd version of it, since the new addons for the V Collection X are great!), which includes V Collection 9 + FX Collection 3 + Pigments 4 + 50 sound banks. Pigments alone is worth the extra value (which is also the cost for it standalone) and is the most interesting single software synthesizer I’ve used in a long time. U$800 is a lot of money, but maybe worth the investment. For some, Pigments alone might be enough, but personally I couldn’t dispatch the whole collection for it.
Some synth enthusiasts also value how close to the original something can be, and might consider different emulations of specific gear, such as U-He RePro 5 for that Prophet V sound, but in the end, there’s a lot of value in here to postpone the purchase of a dedicated emulation. Most of the synthesizers inside VCX are well implemented and enough to make you smile for a long time.
Conclusions
Trying to review everything that is included with Arturia V Collection X is a very hard thing to do. I believe that with this review I’ve summed up the basics for the Collection while giving some personal thoughts on the thing as whole product. I could go deeper on each part, and I do believe that every single product inside of it could provide material enough for its own complete review. I’d encourage you to try several of them and make up your own conclusions – Arturia does a great job allowing users to try their products.
If you’ve read it up to this part, I think you’ve understood how much I appreciated this amazing product. There’s just so much good content inside it that it’s kind of hard to get cynical and “search for hair on an eggshell” (as said in my country). The overall quality of each individual software inside V Collection X is very good, and although some of them are not 100% sound copies of the original hardware on all their sound capabilities, on recordings and blind tests I think it would be quite hard to differentiate one from another.
Price-wise, as mentioned before, it seems fair enough. Individual plugins inside VCX could easily be sold for U$100 on sales and I’d be very happy with what I paid (even consider it a bargain). When you think there are 39 different products inside, 600 bucks seems like a great deal.
In the end, I’d say this thing is just amazing.
Pros:
- Huge collection of iconic synthesizers excellently modeled
- Interface is quick and accessible on most plugins
- Sound-wise it covers a lot of ground when it comes to keyboarded instruments
- Polyphonic use of great monosynths from the past
- Great CPU usage/sound quality ratio on most instruments
Cons:
- No dedicated Drums or Drum Machines, give us MORE!
- Some MIDI hiccups here and there with non-Arturia controllers
- Augmented Instruments do have limitations on polyphony (high CPU usage)
- Sound Explorers Collection 2? (3 would be better, maybe wait for it)
- Limitations on audio-rate modulations for the modeled synths